|
Message From:
Crickdick
on
8/11/2009 8:28:11 PM
|
As this countrys second revolution looms in the near future. I only see the media blowing these stories way out of proportion blaming a person trying to make an honest living.Tragedies happen everyday.I have never heard of TGSCOM Inc. until I read an article in a local anti-gun newspaper.You are not to blame and I will be looking forward to making my first purchase from you.BUCKOFAMA |
|
Message From:
Arizonarifleman
on
8/8/2009 8:29:18 PM
|
Mr. Thompson, and the people at TGSCOM Inc.
I am behind you and your company 100%. If for one minute, I thought gun control could stop these actions, by people who will find "any weapon" to do their evil acts, I would support gun control.
What we have now, and sad to say, probably coming down the pike, is "citizen control", or I should say "subject control", as that will be what we become.
Regards, |
|
Message From:
ShoeFlyShoe
on
8/8/2009 1:11:26 AM
|
A man opts to take lives for no cause; the wake strikes on many shores. Todd Richmond of AP takes TGSCOM, Inc. to task: they’re somehow accountable. Surely none may be held responsible for their actions if another can be placed in the spotlight of blame instead. It's news even if untrue; a firearm was used. Richmond sullies TGSCOM, Inc. for selling a magazine and magazine loading “apparatus”, available from countless sources and benign in every way except as imagined by a light source like himself. He knows the sale did nothing to trigger or facilitate the rampage, but somebody must take the blame Richmond cannot bear to levy on the deserving – Mr. Sodini. Richmond is a bully-pulpit sensationalist who preys on those who know little about firearms or legitimate firearm ownership. His mighty pen fells the innocent, to what end? Read his feeble venture into the realm of once-respectable journalism. He earns our contempt and ridicule by his irresponsible twist on the truth. |
|
Message From:
Stillfree?
on
8/7/2009 10:43:53 PM
|
Cain slew Abel. It is tragic when innocent people lose their lives. I know if it was my wife, friend, relative, I would be enraged to say the least. If we could dump all the killing devices down to the bottom of the sea and live peacefully and happily ever after, that would be great but that is not happening. So in the mean time, we should count our lucky stars that we still have the right to defend our selves and mourn when tragedies like this happen and seek some justice for the perpetrator. Again, if we didn't have guns we would use rocks or clubs or arrows or swords or knives just as we humans have since, you guessed it, Cain slew Abel. |
|
Message From:
soulgruv
on
8/7/2009 10:36:41 PM
|
I heard that all of these killers drank 2% milk regularly. We should lynch the dairy farmers and local markets that furnished killers with the calcium rich cow juice. |
|
Message From:
jimmy
on
8/7/2009 9:20:19 PM
|
I don't see how TGSCOM can be held responsible for the heinous shootings in Pennsylvania, at VT, and NIU.
Why try to villain-ize this business owner. People's wrath should fall squarely on the sickos that commit these terrible acts.
I don't see anything wrong with selling hi-capacity magazines or magazine loading apparatus over the internet. Or firearms for that matter. I'm a lawful gun enthusiast. I have numerous hi-caps and I've never shot anyone.
It's a refrain but it is also true...guns don't kill people. People kill people.
I'm impressed that Mr. Thompson made a disclosure statement regarding the shootings by Cho Seung-Hui. He may have made others involving the other two shootings. According to the statement, TGSCOM followed the law in the weapons transaction. Cho Seung-Hui passed the background checks.
|
|
Message From:
bobr
on
8/7/2009 7:31:04 PM
|
Although I prefer to buy my guns locally, for a number of reasons, I support you guys 100%. |
|
Message From:
yetanotherTGSCOMsponsoredshooting
on
8/7/2009 6:59:07 PM
|
Another murder due to TGSCOM's "business". How do they justify in their own minds what they've done? It's incomprehensible. |
|
Message From:
nice legacy
on
8/7/2009 4:51:13 PM
|
I bet this company is so proud of its legacy of making it easier for criminals to get guns and I am sure of murder count of into the 100's.
Fact no one has a need for an automatic weapon period. Fact you have the right to bear arms but not the right to get your hand on any gun available.
This bogus arguement that you are just taking the guns from honest citizens is making our streets, schools and gathering area less safe.
So keep your hunting guns, protect you house with normal fireams and lets get rid of the assalt rifles, automatic guns and the items that can only cause problems
|
|
Message From:
GW
on
8/7/2009 2:14:50 PM
|
Since we are comparing cars to guns: Every car is supposed to be registered and the driver licensed, so shouldn't every gun be registered and every shooter licensed? HELL NO!
I'm an ardent supporter of the Second Amendment. I urge people to think things through before posting so as to not post something that can be turned around and used by the gun grabbers! |
|
Message From:
Car Chase
on
7/7/2009 10:28:20 AM
|
I watched another high speed car chase in California.The suspect was eventually stopped when he ran a red light and hit an innocent man driving his pickup. Luckily he was only slighly injured. How dare the car dealer sell that car to a criminal. Wake up america it time to outlaw all car sales. Just think with out cars criminals cannot drive to the gun store to purchase guns. Kpope licened ccw and lifetime NRA member. |
|
Message From:
Rob
on
2/17/2008 8:12:34 PM
|
...And what do you have to say for yourselves now that you have also sold merchandise to the killer at NIU? How do you guys get to sleep at night?? Some business you all have there. Haven't you considered for a moment that the notion of any freak being able to buy this stuff online is ludicrous? If you haven't you might as well go sell Meth as those folks don't have a conscious and can sleep just fine too... Think about it guys. |
|
Message From:
scottishhighlander
on
2/16/2008 4:01:26 PM
|
MY condolences go to the families in the trajic death of their loved ones.to stop these disturbed people before this happens;I think their family and friends should get these folks help or let people that can be alerted |
|
Message From:
Tyrell Washington
on
2/16/2008 2:58:14 PM
|
Right2know, your forget that the whitest state in the country is Vermont and the most african-americans live in Washington DC. That is a major source for the violence in DC and none in Vermont. |
|
Message From:
Right2Know
on
2/16/2008 11:48:50 AM
|
Someone doesn't go on a shooting rampage in a state that potentially everyone else could also be carrying a gun. Rather, when a state makes it easy by prohibiting concealed carry, they need not worry about having the tables turned on them since they know its safe for them to brandish a weapon.
Just try and imagine a hostage situation where any number of those people are carrying a gun. They wouldn't be hostages for long.
|
|
Message From:
Right2Know
on
2/16/2008 10:54:45 AM
|
It has long been proven, although continually ignored, that states with the toughest gun laws have some of the highest rate of murders committed with a gun. |
|
Message From:
Right2Know
on
2/16/2008 10:54:12 AM
|
(cont.)
In comparison with Vermont, which has the least restrictive gun laws in the nation, and Washington D.C. which is of the toughest, the latest 2006 crimes per 100,000 people shows the murder rate in Burlington,VT to be 2.6 verses Washington,DC which was 29.1 (almost 10 times higher!). The national rate is 7 (still more than twice as high as Vermont).
In comparing Boston with Rutland in the use of a gun during the commission of a murder the results are even more apparent.
Boston, which has enacted the toughest gun laws in the nation, had 13.3 murders per 100,000 compared with the nation’s average of 7. And when you compare that with a large city in Vermont, such as Rutland, the results are even more surprising. There was not a single murder there (based on the final 2006 FBI Crime Statistics).
|
|
Message From:
A Virginian
on
2/16/2008 10:13:43 AM
|
As an American, a Virginian, a friend, and family of Virginia Tech. Alumni, all I've got to say is... Wake the F*#@ up and quit your bitchin'. Realize that gun control will never go away until all Americans learn to speak up. Stop talking about it! Do something about it! The easiest thing to do is to support folks, like Ron Paul, who without a doubt has defended our Constitution and our Freedom. I know, actually getting out to vote for what we believe in is just too much...Hell, we obviously like typing. Write a letter to each Presidential Candidate and tell em' to stop the bullshit and leave us alone. BECAUSE WE ARE THE PEOPLE! |
|
Message From:
mtbikerjim
on
2/16/2008 10:04:53 AM
|
Our second amendment right to bear arms should never be taken away. I agree with the owner's comments. It is not guns that kill people but people kill people. A firearm needs to be respected and our people use the firearms on the market today will determine positive or negative outcomes.
Please do not blame the gun dealers. They are doing their jobs. Like any business, they are there to make a living too.
We all have to respect firearms. We shouldn't stop the sales of firearms , but maybe stricter gun control laws that would include tougher background that would result in looking into the history of any previous mental illnesses brought forth on to any individuals obtaining of firearms for the sole purpose of killing humans.....WE all have the right to protect selfs and that should never be taken away. |
|
Message From:
Rambosky
on
2/16/2008 9:36:26 AM
|
I am a Vietnam combat vetran and a former law inforcement officer. I presently work for a company that makes body armor for the police and military.
My family, friends and co-workers all support the posistion and statements that you have posted because it's reality.
|
|
Message From:
Jim Stevens
on
2/16/2008 8:22:39 AM
|
Eric,
Perhaps you are right. If we were all arms we would not have this problem. If the student at NIU each had been carrying a gun, they could have shot it out with the gunman right there. Same thing at Virginia Tech. If everyone had a gun, the moment this nut job starts firing the good people like you and me who carry guns, could have unloaded our weapon on this fruitcake. Perhaps if we educate the public that if we all carry guns, we can prevent tragedies by allowing the good people to shoot down a crazy killer the moment he starts firing. THE SOLUTION IS EVERYONE NEEDS TO BE ARMED. This way we can all end conflicts like this on our streets without innocent lives being taken. If everyone was armed, we could stop crimes in progress too so it would provide an extra measure of security. Who knows maybe it will make the police's job easier. Thanks for protecting our right to bear arms.
Jim |
|
Message From:
stupid people do stupid things
on
2/16/2008 12:43:03 AM
|
without a site with this, the two major shootings at two college, it would have not happened, i think you should shut down the site!! |
|
Message From:
Glock32Owner
on
2/15/2008 11:56:51 PM
|
Eric,
First, it is a shame you should even have to apologize for the actions of criminals, but since we live in a world where nobody feels they are responsible for their own actions anymore, we shouldn't be surprised. I disagree with your characterization of these University murder incidents as "tragedys". I contend that a true tragedy results from something we have absolutely no control, or little control over. For instance a bus full of nuns and orphans goes over the cliff because the brakes went out. When someone commits pre-meditated murder, that is not a tragedy, its an unforgivable criminal act. I simply feel the word "tragedy" is overused by the media and politicians in a vailed attempt to make everyone feel better. These nutcases took weapons into "feel good" gun free zones and committed murder. The only solution to this problem is to abolish "gun free zones" and allow law abiding citizens who wish to, carry concealed handguns.
|
|
Message From:
pro gun?
on
2/15/2008 11:42:39 PM
|
If the gun advocates on here cannot even spell correctly, why should we trust them with a gun? |
|
Message From:
John
on
2/15/2008 11:06:31 PM
|
Oh, and incidentally, two students armed with firearms PREVIOUSLY stopped a mass-murder in progress at the Appalachian Law School. Ignoring what LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS do with guns, the administrators at Virginia Tech (in the same state!!!) fought tooth and nail a bill that would've allowed the LAW-ABIDING Va Tech students, and other students in VA, to be able to defend themselves against people like Cho. And they crowed loudly with joy when they managed to shoot the bill down and maintain their defense-free victim zone. Cho's rampaging with impunity across the Va Tech campus was the sad, almost predictable result (ever notice what a high percentage of these rampages are in "gun-free" zones?) They got what they begged for. A defense-free victim zone... Then contrast that with what happened at New Life Church in Colorado. Honestly, the stupidity of some people is just breathtaking... |
|
Message From:
John
on
2/15/2008 11:00:59 PM
|
You "never read about how a firearm saved somebody's life" because the vast majority of the time, the media DOESN'T COVER THAT -- they only the occasions on which weapons are misused. If people like you had your way, it would still be a felony for an innocent woman to carry a firearm in my state to protect herself from her ex-boyfriend who's vowed to rape and kill her. |
|
Message From:
karma sucks
on
2/15/2008 10:28:20 PM
|
glad i'm me, and not you at tgscom. gotta be hard to sleep at night knowing that you caused so much tragedy in so many lives. never read about how one of your guns ever saved anyone's life and won't because they don't. sick to do what you do for money. |
|
Message From:
Jonathon
on
2/15/2008 10:03:59 PM
|
Fall of 2006, for message below. My mistake. |
|
Message From:
Jonathon
on
2/15/2008 9:01:01 PM
|
This is in response to the prior comment. The one who is armed has the power to protect life and to destroy it. Your life is sustained militarily through arms while, in theory, civilian affairs are supposed to carry on uneventfully within this protection.
The shooter at NIU was a Teaching Assistant in a class I had in the Fall of 2007 with Dr. Cappell called "Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods" where we talked about 'statistical anomolies.' To say an event is improbable is to admit that its occurrence is indeed possible, however statistically insignificant. Steven roamed around the classroom and helped to teach this concept to students.
Ironically, the action you deem as a statistical improbability was in fact carried out by a man that knew more about statistical improbabilities than you or I.
Therefore, a Concealed Carry Law would be beneficial for a minority of people who would have the power to react with return fire and help to protect the innocent.
|
|
Message From:
tgscom supporter
on
2/15/2008 8:59:51 PM
|
The media's fingerpointing of tgscom is irresponsible and akin to smear campaign. When a murderer stabs someone to death, there's no article that says 'Walmart sold the knife that killed XYZ'. TGSCOM transfered firearm to local federal firearm license holder, and they in turn enforce the mandatory waiting period.
As for people who are anti-gun, know that statistics state that most people will have to deal with criminals in their lifetime. Feel free to look up statistics in your city as to how long it takes for police to get to you, before the criminal shoots/robs you in your own home. Know that your choice made you unable to protect your loved ones. |
|
Message From:
Ohio
on
2/15/2008 8:52:45 PM
|
All that can be done is to pray for you. After the killings at NIU were indirectly linked to you, one can only wonder how many others have been enbaled by your business |
|
Message From:
dj miknoche
on
2/15/2008 8:46:10 PM
|
I could never live in the USA (I live in Canada), knowing some of your crazy folks are allowed to buy powerful weapons to kill innocent people. And I don't agree that students should have the right to bear arms on campus, it's gonna become the "shoot'em up corral", with the confusion of cops and civilians, what a mess it's going to be the day you American civilians decide to take the law in your own hands. Anyway, I guess it will happen and that's the American way. I've visited the States and I enjoyed talking and visiting folks, really. I just wish you didn't have this fascination and obsession with guns. Anyway, good luck and take care. |
|
Message From:
Al
on
2/15/2008 8:24:10 PM
|
its a tough call ...and anything can be a weapon in the hands of a troubled individual . |
|
Message From:
bardi
on
2/15/2008 8:21:07 PM
|
It is pointless reasoning with any of you who support the gun madness in our society. I will only say this - One day you will all stand before Jesus Christ (the one who created all those who have been killed by your guns) and made to give an accounting of your lives. Sorry, but all you legal constitutional crap won't mean a thing to our creator. |
|
Message From:
Trish
on
2/15/2008 7:51:32 PM
|
Most of these arguments for gun ownership assume that people are constantly out for your money and possessions. Events like the ones at Virgina or Northern Illinois are statistically anomalous, meaning that they're so rare they carry little weight when considering what constitutes "normal" everyday experience. Which is to say that they can in no way be used rationally as an argument for concealed carry laws or anything else. You may as well also push for "lottery insurance" to protect against random influxes of cash. |
|
Message From:
Geoff
on
2/15/2008 7:33:03 PM
|
While your business maybe by law innocent of the crime, the fact that "madmen" can buy what they need to carryout their crimes makes your busimness questionable. The right to bear arms does not prevent the sane people in this world from enacting laws or cool down periods that minimze this type of behaviour. The internet is not a place to buy arms.
|
|
Message From:
james
on
11/26/2007 3:15:57 AM
|
This is very sad.
The messages from the peoples republic are even sadder. All legal paper work was done, the government safeguards clearly failed. Everyone followed by the law (save the SOUTH KOREAN kid (note: a non-communist country, having nothing to do with chairman Mao ZeDong or Stalin, or Lenin, or Trotsky)). Not even the Chinese leaders (by standards of late these kids are fairly astute capitalists, and they have us by the balls with their foreign currency holdings). The U.S. government only needs to enforce the laws Federal laws on the books. This kid should have never been allowed a fire-arm in the first place. It's not your fault that fed background checks did not catch this. I wish you the best of luck.
P.S. where is my order (number 115487). All items were in stock when I placed the order.
Again, I hope it all works out in the end.
Thanks,
James |
|
Message From:
Citizen
on
10/17/2007 1:29:08 PM
|
If all Americans decided that to own a firearm is wrong they should also be prepared to give up their possessions, property, and freedom. The liberties we all so enjoy have been long guarded by good men and women of strong conviction and character who were and are willing to pick up that weapon and use it. Not only to defend their freedom but that of their fellow countrymen. Restriction of firearm sales and purchases is not the answer. If everyone owned a gun few would be so bold as to draw theirs against another. America would not be a free and civilized nation without firearms. The minute we let down our guard and fail in our civic duty the America we all dream of will cease to exist. If 1 of the students at VA Tech had been legally carrying a handgun the death toll might have been much lower. |
|
Message From:
2004R6
on
9/27/2007 7:58:55 PM
|
That statement is so true, the weapons aren't at fault it's the wacko's that are getting them. Also I believe that the "gun free zones" and magazine limitations are just a way to pacify the non-gun owners, so they can feel safe. Well it doesn't matter what a sign says if someone's intent on committing a crime they will. And 10 bullets are just as deadly as 15. Also as a concealed license holder in Texas, I was very shocked to see that several states that guns are produced in don't even have concealed permits available to citizens. |
|
Message From:
happy howard
on
7/12/2007 7:42:09 PM
|
It is getting increasingly unhappy with the public do gooders.They endorce guns to protect "NORTH AMERICA" BUT NOT INDIVIDAULS!We cannot go back as a Indian tribe in N.A.who did give up there arms,and whithin 15 years get overun by there neighbours.The common belief is and will always b "if you got it ,i wan't,if you are in my way ,I'LL DO YOU! IF THEY TAKE MY GUN PROTECTION AWAY I WILL FIND ANOTHER,BUT HEY I'AM A NON VIOLENT GOD FEARING PERSON,WHY AGGITATE ME? |
|
Message From:
Comrade_Kazimir
on
6/14/2007 4:34:11 AM
|
So in the end he died and was abandoned by his Comrades. But I leave with saying Capitalist is bad and Communism is better form of Government. Most you look at the glorious People's Republic Of China for an Example.
WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE! - Mao Ze Dong |
|
Message From:
Comrade_Kazimir
on
6/14/2007 4:33:50 AM
|
In Communist society there no worries of gun violence Cho himself was Communist he hated Capitalist. Capitalist must be destroyed from earth they are what are holding the working classes down you see this propaganda against Capitalists was what Cho saw he saw the rich people how they can get by this corrupt capitalist system with their wealth he saw the problem in America. Cho killed those people as a flag to look upon your Capitalists Imperialist System to rise up against your corrupt government and take power. Power for the people and start a new global revolution a Communist Revolution! But i must say Cho doing such by killing was not the best way to get the point of the revolution across. I have contacted Communist Party USA and they have said they have dishonorably removed Cho from the party. |
|
Message From:
Rocco
on
6/5/2007 10:02:06 PM
|
Making guns illegal, or any similar or additional ban is about as effective as making drugs illegal. I could go out right now and purchase some drugs, not that I would want to, but I could. WAIT A MINUTE! Are drugs not illegal? Why can I still get drugs? Because making something illegal does not make them NON-EXISTENT. We have a drug problem in this country... Criminalizing them has not helped. Now I am not an advocate of drugs by any means and in no way am I calling for their legalization, I am merely providing an example. Banning a certain thing REALLY does not help get rid of it. |
|
Message From:
k.kelley
on
6/5/2007 6:20:47 PM
|
Armed men are free men, unarmed men are subjects(of a king).
.........Mis-quoted from a historical figure |
|
Message From:
BARRY H.
on
6/2/2007 11:10:05 AM
|
GUNS DO NOT KILL PEOPLE. IT IS A SHAME THAT PEOPLE ARE TOO THICKHEADED TO EDUCATE THEMSELVES PROPERLY, WETHER IT BE STORAGE, PROPER SAFETY, LAWS, ETC. TO TRY TO ELIMINATE GUNS AND TO PUT EXTREME LAWS ADN RESTRICTIONS ON GOD FEARING LAW ABIDING CITIZENS IS TORALLY WRONG. LOOK AT OTHER COUNTRIES. THE CRIMINALS STILL SEEM TO GET GUNS. ALSO, TAKE TIME TO LOOK AT THE MUNICIPALITIES THAT DO HAVE PROPER GUN ORDINANCES AND CARRY LAWS... THE CRIME IS LESS. COME ON PEOPLE... EDUCATE YOURSELVES RATHER THAN SAY OH, ALL GUNS ARE BAD JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE IS CRAZY AND PERFORMS A SEVERE CRIMINAL ACT. I WAS VERY FORTUNATE TO GROW UP IN GUNNING, HUNTING FAMILY. TAUGHT RESPOSIBILITY USE, CARE ETC. HAD A SHOTGUN AND RIFLE SINCE ABOUT 8 YEARS OLD... WAS NOT ALLOWED TO "PLAY" ONLY USE FOR TARGET PRACTICE AND HUNTING WITH CONTROLLED ADULT SUPERVISION. I CAN ONLY PRAY THAT OUR LEADERS, (CURRENT AND FUTURE) UNDERSTAND OUR RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, AND WHAT OUR PROUR NATION WAS FOUNDED ON. |
|
Message From:
DarkNite
on
5/27/2007 3:58:21 PM
|
You can't legislate against crazy. Fact is the shooter should have been in the data base for mental abberations. Wake up, it's the state's fault for not enforcing it's own laws. More gun laws only ham string honest citizens, and why pass more when the state's attorneys just let law breakers plea down to lesser charges? Where I live it takes the cops 45 minutes to get here. In the mean time a lot can happen, so I practice at the range and keep sharp, just to make sure I live through those 45 minutes.
My heart goes out to those who lost loved ones, and it is the survivors we should be concerned about, not some political agenda being used to grab votes from bleeding hearts. A good many of our leaders should be ashamed of themselves for proposing new restrictions before the smoke cleared, or the facts were known.
Va needs to enforce the laws they have, not add more red tape. The bad guys don't care about red tape, they can plea to a lesser charge. |
|
Message From:
Adam B. Central Illinois
on
5/26/2007 9:47:36 PM
|
I hate that bad people have to ruin our gun rights, the liberal jackass polititians. You cant blame the average American gun owners for that social perasite that committed that tragedy |
|
Message From:
Tim
on
5/26/2007 6:41:07 PM
|
AS I SEE ITS BEEN SAID MANY TIMES HERE GUNS ARE ONLY TOOLS THEY HAVE NO MIND OF THERE OWN MINE HAVE NEVER ESCAPED MY SAFE TO RUN ABOUT SHOOTING FOLKS AND WHERE DID THIS FANTASY OF THE POLICE BEING A PRIVATE SECURITY FORCE COME FROM I HAVE A NEIGHBOR THAT THINKS SHE DOESNT NEED A WEAPON CAUSE SHE WILL JUST CALL THE POLICE AS I HAVE EXPLAINED TO HER ALL THE POLICE WILL DO IS INVESTIGATE THE CRIME SCENE THAT USED TO BE YOUR HOME LETS WAKE UP PEOPLE AND START BEING THE INSTUMENTS OF OUR OWN PROTECTION GOD BLESS THE USA AND PRAY FOR THE VT FAMILIES |
|
Message From:
SICK OF IT
on
5/26/2007 6:02:06 AM
|
I would like to know if anyone could tell me? do these people who go after the gun owners and dealers also go after the companies that sell baseball bats, i mean they are used to commit murders,and, what about knife companies,also the people who make #2 pencils. I know the last one seems a little silly but if you work in jails or prisons you would know just how dangerous they can be. let a gun be used and the world stops. guns don't kill people,people kill people. it doesn't matter where the gun comes from it's the person who carries out the crime. so get off our backs and get the backs of the criminals. |
|
Message From:
N3ATS
on
5/24/2007 9:07:23 PM
|
As a gun owner, a concealed carry permit holder, hunter, and firearms enthusiast, I would like to express my appreciation on how you have handled this situation.
Thanks for being open about it, allowing debate, and for standing up and taking the high road.
You operated within the law. You followed the rules, and did everything by the "book". You have nothing to regret or be sorry for. I am sure the actions of Seung-Hui weighs heavy upon you heart, as it does any decent compassionate human being. Rest assured you have nothing to feel sorry about.
Know one could have known that this man would do what he did. Not me, you, and certainly not his victims. This is an unfortunate act that is certainly beyond the comprehension of everyone involved.
Keep up the good work, and take care.
Steve Weiss
New Providence, PA |
|
Message From:
Manners
on
5/20/2007 1:30:08 AM
|
I'm sincerly sorry for those that lost loved ones.
It was a mentally fouled up person that took their family and friends lives. The gun was just the instrument of the deed. Knowone blames, (or gives credit) to the hammer, for a poorly built, (or well built) house.
Live with a desire for a better world, and teach your children the importance of good character, personal integrity, and the courage it requires to choose good over evil. Want the right things, for the right reasons.
Keep guns loaded, clean and know how to use them. Protect
yourself, your family, your community, and your country.
God help us, become better. |
|
Message From:
Clay
on
5/17/2007 5:58:42 PM
|
I also would like to proudly state that this sick, messed up individual is to blame for this horrible act and not the weapon. If that big sticker on the doors that says no guns permitted on premises wasn't there I'm sure there would be some individual with conceal carry license would have stopped the shooter or at least lowered the amount killed. All gun control laws do is keep honest, law abiding citizens with their hands behind our back unable to stop those breaking the law and harming innocent people! Those who are going to break the law do not care about the laws or a sticker on a door that says "No Guns Allowed!" TGS I still PROUDLY support you. Only an idiot could blame you for what happened. Thanks |
|
Message From:
my random thoughts
on
5/12/2007 12:14:38 PM
|
its too bad some honest person was not breaking the law that day, by carrying his/her concealed firearm on campus, then Cho Seung Hui would not have become the next "hero" to the next lunatic. I'll bet that 50% of VT students are at least armed with pepper spray and knives these days.
after 9/11 i was ready to buy my first handgun, but never did. I was only a shotgun owner before. now after this VT tragedy im doing my research and about to purchase one. so terrorist, criminal, lunatic, and thug punk kid there is one more trained, armed, responsible citizen you'll have to deal with! we've got to just out number them!!
to the ignorant british who posted before, dont forget without help from us crazed armed "yanks", there would probably be a Nazi flag flying over the UK today, and then you'd wish you had some guns!! |
|
Message From:
Dogface...
on
5/10/2007 11:06:12 PM
|
Nobody holds car dealerships responsible when the idiotic, the insane, and the inebriated kill people with their cars. It's the same with firearms. Use them responsibly and nobody gets hurt. Cho had to get the weapon from somebody. I'm sorry you "won" that lottery. I myself am a gun owner. Regrettably, Wisconsin (my home as well as TGSCOM's) is one of only two states in the Union where there is no mechanism for law-abiding citizens to carry a concealed weapon. Like one of the posts noted, the cops have no duty to help you, so you'd better help yourself. God bless you and the victims at VT. And may God have mercy on the soul of the shooter. He was a broken and deranged human being. |
|
Message From:
JH
on
5/10/2007 6:23:29 PM
|
Everyone Keeps talking negatively about "liberals" and "hippies" on here. I am very left-wing and have a shaggy beard and love the Greatful Dead. That being said, I'm also a proud gun owner, and have a Carry-Concealed Licence. I practice my marksmanship, and know how to holster and store my weapon in a safe, responsible manner.
I would never draw my weapon with the intent of harming an innocent human being. But say I'm a VT student and CCW is allowed there. Seung-Cho comes into my class and starts shooting, I'm returning fire and his evil rampage is over. My pistol can hold 16+1, and I own 4 magazines. In a small classroom, I suspect it would only take me a few shots and he's done and the death toll is much, much smaller. Why? Because somebody (a liberal!) would have been using a gun in self-defense and the defense of others.. |
|
Message From:
Solider
on
5/9/2007 2:28:43 PM
|
I am in serving in Iraq right now, been here for awhile. But I know that my girlfriend is at home safe, cause we have a gun in the house, and she has one that she carries with her. I hope to GOD that the time for her to use it never happens, but if it does I'd be damned if she is gonna be the victim. As for the VA shootings, it was so pre-mediated that nobody saw it coming, but if anyone just happened to be carrying today, the casualty count would have been alot lower. My prayers are with you & the families of those that lost their loved ones in VA. Also for those families whose son or daughter wont be coming home from Iraq. GO HOKIES/GOD BLESS THE USA |
|
Message From:
Tom
on
5/9/2007 1:12:49 PM
|
By the way, Dave, speaking of the Bible. it also says he who lives by the sword, shall die by the sword. I think this is Gods way of telling us it's okay to blow away the guy that's breaking into your house w/ a gun. |
|
Message From:
Tom
on
5/9/2007 1:09:01 PM
|
This is a response for Dave, who seems to think the manufacturer/seller of the weapon shares a degree of responsibility for the murder of anyone by the weapon they make or sell;
Shame on you, and grow the Hell up. Law abiding people buy guns that are maunufactured and sold for 100% DEFENSIVE REASONS. The lawful carrier of a weapon values life, and has made a very important, serious decision to take the responsibility to decide if, even if the chance of it happening is extremely remote, he may need to end a life that day, in order to save his own YOUR'S, or YOUR DAUGHTER'S, as she sit's in her classroom, ducking the shots, hoping the lunatic spraying bullets doesn't notice her.
Is it the drug company's fault the depressed teenager poured the bottle of pills down her throat?
Is it Budweiser's fault your Uncle Ralph got cirrhosis?
All this time, Ron Goldman's folks could have been suing Schrade Cutlery, and not O.J.
It was the guy, Dave. 100%. Period. |
|
Message From:
Detective Braun
on
5/9/2007 9:09:36 AM
|
911 is government sponsored dial-a-prayer. The first person you should look to to protect yourself is YOU. |
|
Message From:
Tim L. Starko
on
5/6/2007 10:59:59 PM
|
Cho was one sick human being, no one should have been killed. Let this be a lesson to those who think of doing this |
|
Message From:
motorhogman
on
5/6/2007 8:32:17 AM
|
The fact that this "green card" alien was able to purchase a gun legally is what bothers me. Why does VA law permit a person who is not an American to purcase any weapon, let alone a concealable one ? I have a CWP in SC yet VA does not recognize it but they have no issue selling to an alien...I think every law abiding American should think about the positive aspects of carrying a concealed weapon. How many people do you suppose that bastard would have shot if the whole room had a weapon on them ? My guess would not be 33. This fibre of this country is being slowly destroyed by politcians and the "protect me from myself" groups. They live in a make believe world where passing idiotic laws is the solution to everything. |
|
Message From:
Dee
on
5/5/2007 8:01:03 PM
|
I too believe it was NO FAULT on your Company's part to sell the 'crazed man' the gun. How are you too know if someone is to use a gun for that purpose!?! I am a gun owner and BELIEVE that it is our RIGHT to OWN AND PROTECT ourselves from others like that man or any others that may try to harm us or our families.
Thank You!
Dee |
|
Message From:
mjt
on
5/5/2007 8:31:47 AM
|
Firstly, as an Englishman let me apologise for the Idiot Brit who posted earlier - he was merely expressing his ignorance of the subject. The simple facts are that no gun ever killed anyone on its own - it is merely a tool which makes it much easier. Like nuclear weapons, the genie is out of the bottle, and you can never put it back in, which means that we need to arm to defend ourselves. It seems Ironic that Tony Blair banned handguns in the UK but was chomping at the bit to go to war in Iraq (using of course - guns!)
Go to Switzerland where everyone is required to have an automatic weapon at home and you don't have much gun crime. In England gun crime is on the increase - banning guns there ENSURED that only bad guys have guns.
I lived in the US for three years and carried a gun concealed most of the time, and felt much better for it. When I returned home the first thing I noticed was how dangerous the streets felt, and how helpless I was. |
|
Message From:
23c
on
5/4/2007 3:31:27 PM
|
to all of you fun and care giving hippies. should we also ban steak knives and chef knives, since many people that have passeed have been on the other end of this type of tragic murder. why cant we all just understand that vile human beings are the ones that create this type of evil and not pruducts that we create. im sorry that you feel that you are equal to a piece of machined piece of metal. if you think about it that is why people are put on trial not a gun, knife, bat, car, and many more objects that murder people everyday. i wonder what the answer would be, do you plead guilt or not guilty mr p22 or mr f250. |
|
Message From:
al vega
on
5/3/2007 11:12:10 PM
|
is there anyway possible we can all get together and get a new rule must be 24 or 26 years old to own a gun the mind is still to young still in college still thinking of party drugs and stupit desicions now way a college kid should have a gun i own 3 guns my self but im 33 years old family kids and im settle down yes we need guns to protect our family but lets get real 21 is to young is when drinking is leagal mix it with a gun and we will have more problems |
|
Message From:
why
on
5/2/2007 10:04:12 PM
|
School is a place for learning not dieing. Arm the teachers and staff. |
|
Message From:
Bad design
on
5/2/2007 10:01:04 PM
|
If you want to hold someone responsible other than the hospital that released Cho lets blame the architect that designed that room to have only two exits. |
|
Message From:
Will Smith
on
5/2/2007 9:58:26 PM
|
Gun free zones= easy victims. You can run all you want but you'll just die tired. fight fire with fire. Arm the staff and students. Give everyone a way of defending themselves with like force. When only one has a gun, then there were none. It's sad that no one was able to defend themselves and disable some little Korean with a .22 and a 9mm....just unbelievable and pretty pathetic. |
|
Message From:
psych ward patient
on
5/2/2007 9:53:40 PM
|
This is not a lesson to teach about gun control but rather the rules concerning the information from health care. If you check yourself into a mental health facility or are forcibly placed there because you have violent tendencies and are dangerous and violent you should not be allowed to purchase a handgun and the DOJ and BATF should be aware of these mentally unstable individuals past history. |
|
Message From:
Asian assasin
on
5/2/2007 9:42:04 PM
|
Cho is just one more example of the need for immigration reform. Less foreigners here wanting to kill us. Koreans, Russians, Chinese, middle easterners and such should not be allowed to purchase small arms. |
|
Message From:
warrior171
on
5/2/2007 9:37:03 PM
|
......This is still active today where the Constitution is actually suspended. Senate Report 93-549 1973, "The powers under these Statutes (3-9-1933), the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities, assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and...control the lives of all American citizens." Research Congressman James Beck and his speech just prior to its approval. Congress nor the President are held to the Constitution, thus countless calculated court cases of interpretation geared in the Judicial Branch,,,, for a time of a new reinstitution constitution and it will be too late for you.
ARMNOW |
|
Message From:
warrior171
on
5/2/2007 9:36:29 PM
|
This is only the beginning people. They've already circled the wagon (the Constitution) and you're just catching headlines of an Ammendment dismantling from within said powers. March 4th, 1933 FDR inaugurated into office. March 9th 1933 Congress approved in special session, his proclomation 2038 that became known as the Act of March 9th, 1933: "Be enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of United States of America in Congress assembled, that the Congress hereby declares that a serious national emergency exists and that it is imperitively necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national application." continued...... |
|
Message From:
Agile
on
5/2/2007 9:35:22 PM
|
This horrible event is just one more example where innocent people are losing there lives due to the inability to defend themselves. More guns in the hands of responsible people is the only way of preventing this from happening again. When guns become outlawed then only outlaws will have guns. The 2nd Amendment was written to insure that citizens have a means of defending themselves and their homes with equal force. |
|
Message From:
M1014
on
5/2/2007 9:28:45 PM
|
Concealed carry should be legal in all states: criminals would think twice before committing murder and those on a rampage could be stopped before others are killed.
As the late Vice President Hubert Humphrey put it, “The right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible.”
Those who beat their swords into plows, will plow the fields of those still with swords.
An armed man is a citizen, and unarmed man is a subject.
A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.” ~~ George Washington
|
|
Message From:
coolheadluke
on
5/2/2007 4:53:04 PM
|
I have 1 question. How many people would have lived if that was not a "GUN-FREE ZONE? |
|
Message From:
coolheadluke
on
5/2/2007 4:49:51 PM
|
I feel that gun-free zones provide easy targets. The only people with weapons in those Zones are the ones that don't follow the laws. IF GUNS ARE OUTLAWED THEN ONLY OUTLAWS WILL HAVE GUNS. The outlaws will have the upper hand and create even easier targets. I will not be a easy taarget!! |
|
Message From:
I have a Brain
on
5/2/2007 3:23:10 PM
|
Erm, maybe if stupid fuckers such as yourself stopped selling guns then we wouldnt have weird fuckers such as the korean who shot up virginia tech?? would we?? or maybe we would?? who knows...2nd amendmant my arse!! Stupid yank fuckers!! Thinking you are the police of the world - you dont have a clue!! You have no idea!! you`ll get whats coming to you you fucking power crazed wankers - 9/11 all the way!! All the best - England!! xx |
|
Message From:
gunsluvver
on
5/1/2007 2:42:25 PM
|
Hey I'm groovin' on this from Mr Tomson: ...Supreme Court has ruled that the People do not have any expectation of protection from law enforcement and has upheld it several times since.
Been tryin' to put this together -- so what did the court say? What decision, what words? Want to work it all out, help! |
|
Message From:
Brooks
on
5/1/2007 1:30:08 PM
|
If any "blame" for this is to be placed on anyone it is to be placed on the one(s) that had the power to lock up Cho in a mental hospital and keep him locked up. Cho was clearly identified as one who was "a danger to himself and others" and showed all the signs of a psychopathic murderer. Because of this Cho was placed in a mental facility against his will for evaluation. A "judge" let him out and back into the public. If that judge would have committed Cho like it was very obvious at the time he should have, Cho would at least have on his record that he was not permitted to own a gun and would have been denied transfer and so possession of the guns he bought. Further, he might still be locked up in a mental hospital getting some sort of help and the massacre might never have been committed. The real focus should be on that judge, and other judges and "law makers" that have done, and continue to do, through their "permission", similar things.k |
|
Message From:
MyEagle15
on
4/30/2007 2:31:14 PM
|
Not only are the gun control lobby responsible for the Virginia Tech murders but I personally hold each and every one of them accountable for 9/11 too. If our duly sworn law enforcement officers had been carrying on those planes the mission would likely have been thwarted. The right to carry should also be extended to college students, instructors, and administrators so long as they are doing so legally. As a veteran public school teacher I must say that I do not feel safe knowing that our public schools are completely defenseless against such attacks. It is a ridiculous and completely irresponsible policy that should be changed. Mr. Thompson you did nothing wrong. |
|
Message From:
Wahoo
on
4/30/2007 8:39:07 AM
|
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms . . . disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes . . . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”
-Thomas Jefferson |
|
Message From:
JasonVanDyke
on
4/29/2007 11:36:58 PM
|
Of course TopGlock is not to blame and I will continue to shop on their website. I am an attorney, I sometime need to travel to sketchy parts of town, and when I do I am glad that I have a gun with me. |
|
Message From:
chuck
on
4/29/2007 8:39:43 PM
|
Good day brother American. I find it sad that there are people in this fine country who feel it necessary to harrass honorable, legitimate businessmen such as yourself. Truly, the real tragedy here lies in the fact that this happened in a "gun free zone". The only thing safe about a gun free zone is the security it provides the crazy nutcases like the one at Virgina Tech. The real crime was committed when the government restricted when and where a person could carry a concealed firearm for protection. What about the rights of the students who were slaughtered? Shouldn't they have received the same benefits of the second ammendment like everyone else? It's not rocket science, the only way to ensure your own safety is to be prepared to protect yourself anywhere you travel. If just one of the slain students had a firearm, this tragedy would have had a very different ending.
Keep up the good work gentlemen, you folks do a wonderful job. |
|
Message From:
bill
on
4/29/2007 6:02:56 PM
|
Gun laws need to be "adjusted." Only U.S. citizens should be able to obtain a gun. And even if you checked yourself into a mental institution on an outpatient basis, you should be denied a weapon as well. However, at the end of the day, you can have as many laws as you want. Evil and sick people will still do bad things. If they do not care about a person's life, do you really think they care about laws? Which are nothing more than ink on paper! What really matters is how WE THE PEOPLE created a society which allowed guy like Cho to become filled with anger and hatred. Many picked on him, laughed at him. Yet few tried to help him? I am curious to know how many anti-gun people spend time and money helping the mentally ill? Evil and sickness helped cause this. Gun-free zones allowed the death toll to rise as high as it did. After-all, these law abiding citizens had their freedom(of choice) to defend themselves taken away. |
|
Message From:
NJ Shooter
on
4/29/2007 8:45:56 AM
|
I'm sorry but it appears the sale was legitiment. Do we blame the car manufactures or dealers if a nut buys a car and kills someone? How about the medical schools and hospitals that turn out, and allow quacks to practice medicine? And what was wrong with the students, afraid to protect them selves? Maybe they should bring their Mommies to class to protect them. An individules safety or lack thereof is that individules sole responsibility. |
|
Message From:
dave
on
4/29/2007 5:24:24 AM
|
Yes, the gun is only a tool- but what kind of tool is it? Yes the killer is a madman, but, it is logical to assign some, not all, yes, of the blame to the person that makes the tool. You get many letters of support from those who do not want to give up their tool, nor admit to themselves that their mentality is a violent one. The Bible said it all long ago- practice peace, throw away the violent tools-you can duck, weave, dodge thil you're blue in the face. If there are the ghosts of these gun victims- they will be haunting the ones who made the weapons as well as the madman-killer. And the makers will have to face their maker. You know that, but I can understand why you do not want to admit it. |
|
Message From:
BSP
on
4/28/2007 6:45:05 PM
|
Cho was a sick individual. We have the right to protect ourselves from a deranged madman thanks to the 2nd Ammendment. TGS is a legal and legit business. Hang in there Eric. |
|
Message From:
Nsite
on
4/28/2007 3:05:45 PM
|
Freedom comes at a price. Brave men had to fight for freedom in the U.S. Also , the west was tamed by the use of guns. People had to hunt for food. Firearms are at the root of our history. I know the means little to most people now.Today's the Tech. era , and most children don't even know the hardships their parents faced. I fear that the evil by which we will be undone, Is the lack of values and morals in todays youth. See the boys want to hold ganger rap lifestyle as a priority, *very sad.Thug-life becomes critical path for so many young men. My point is ,the hand in which the gun is held , make the difference in a crime or a "right-of-freedom".Please educate yourself on the First Amendment before responding. |
|
Message From:
bstabob
on
4/28/2007 9:58:21 AM
|
Yes, this is a tragedy by any definition. What made it a massacre was that this madman was the only one with a gun. I know its politically incorrect but its still a fact. I know that the media will completely overlook that fact but its a fact none the less. Stay strong. |
|
Message From:
Law-Abiding
on
4/28/2007 9:43:30 AM
|
Criminals pray on the weak. When was the last time you heard of a cop getting mugged? Even the rich liberal "elite" like Rosie O’Donnell, Michael Moore, Obama, Ted Kennedy all have private ARMED body guards. They all say they feel safer. Many rich folks have bodyguards who can afford them. Hey JR, the courts ruled in the early 80's that police departments cannot be held responsible for protecting their citizens. Translated...you're on your own. This great country is a melting pot and people sometimes don't get along, go crazy, etc. Maybe you should have been living in Louisiana after the hurricane. I'm sure some of those thugs would have given you a big hug. People have been murdered since the beginning of time. What's your plan for stopping rapes? Castration? Now swallow this big dose of reality and kiss that make-believe place you live in goodbye. Yes, I'm active duty military. Good day, sir. |
|
Message From:
Law-Abiding
on
4/28/2007 9:42:51 AM
|
You are wrong Chia-ampa. Have you not seen any of the video games out today? I played one as a kid years ago and the favorite weapon was a chainsaw. I stopped for fuel at a truck stop and they were selling a baseball bat called the "Tire Thumper" the advertisement said it would "thump just about anything when called up” followed by a smiley face. The NRA is nothing without its millions of law abiding gun owning citizens who make up that organization. Cho was an adult not a child so yes children should not have access to guns. 80% of the deaths in Iraq are from bombs and mortars not guns. Anti-gunners do not want to hear any these facts. |
|
Message From:
Ciampa
on
4/28/2007 8:55:09 AM
|
There are gaping holes in the logic of all of your overused NRA slogans. One slogan doesn't fit every situation. You may actually have to use your brain instead of regurgitating these one-liners. Let's start with the idea that if Cho didn't get his gun from a dealer he would have got it from the street. First of all that may be true, but the fact is he didn't get them from the street. Maybe we should put crack and heroin in school vending machines since kids are going to get them on the streets anyways. How about "Guns don't kill people..." arguement. Baseball bats, fetilizer and box cutters are not specifically designed to kill people, nor are they advertised for their stopping power or the number of times you could swing the bat at someones head. I may be wrong but I have also never seen a video games where people go on killing sprees with any of these tools. These tools are not glorified nor do they feed the moral downward spiral many here mentioned. |
|
Message From:
71mopar
on
4/28/2007 4:41:08 AM
|
This type of crime started only 40 or so years ago, just about the same time our society excellerated it's moral downward spiral. I'm not taliking about gang wars and that crap, I'm talking about these insane, hateful "loners" that snap and go on killing sprees. The guns have always been here. So where were all the school killing rampages before 1970? The core of our problem is these already unstable minds being nurtured and fed by a depraved entertainment industry and mainstream media. You disagree? Just remember these words 20 years from now.
Anyway, I will continue to support this company, from which I have purchaced 2 GLOCKS for personal defense. They've never sold me an insane, murderous handgun. |
|
Message From:
Brandon
on
4/28/2007 2:30:06 AM
|
If someone kills someone with a baseball bat, should we outlaw bats? If someone kills someone with a knife, should we outlaw cutlery? If someone kills someone with fertilizer-based explosives should we outlaw garden products? - Any person using reason and logic, instead of fear based emotion (usually born of the religious fanatics) would tell you "Of course not!" Again, its not the tool, its the person. And to quote a famous T-shirt from Billy Madison - "Guns don't kill people, I kill people." - Brandon |
|
Message From:
NeonScrew
on
4/28/2007 12:53:33 AM
|
First of all, My thoughts and prayers go out to the friends and family member of the Virginia Tech incident.
Let me also say that in my profession, Law Enforcement, I hear both sides of the gun argument from "Guns should be banned" to the "Everyone should have a gun."
Anyone who sends TGSCOM messages of hate need to realize that GUNS DO NOT KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE.
Think of this, would you have sent hate messages to Wal-Mart if the terrorists that participated in 9-11 purchased their box-cutters from a local Wal-Mart store? |
|
Message From:
Ciampa
on
4/27/2007 11:52:15 PM
|
"Ciampa is Daffy." I never said guns should be banned. As much as I don't trust our government, I don't think martial law is a good idea either. Knowing that anyone could have a gun doesn't make me feel safer. For example there are people like the ignorant racist who posted here by the handle "The Shooter," who unfortunately probably owns guns, that doesn't make me feel safer. I find any fanatic scary I don't care whether they're pro-gun nuts or anti-gun nuts. When you look at any issue as black or white, that's ignorance. I just think idiots who sell guns to idiots should be held accountable. All I am advocating is to be a little more selective and have a more involved process to gun ownership. How about a random check of the persons home to make sure they don't have stockpiles of weapons and hate mongering videos. Or 3 "Not a psycho" references from friends and family. Surely making guns less available to psychos would help minimize bad press for your beloved firearms. |
|
Message From:
FLORIDA CRACKER
on
4/27/2007 11:02:11 PM
|
4 EVER CUSTOMER. PRAYERS GO OUT TO THE FAMLIES OF VT.TGSCOM WELL TRAGIC HAS NO BLOOD ON THERE HANDS FROM THIS TRAGEDY.WE ALL WHO HAVE THE [SOUND MIND] AND RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS NEED TO GET OUT TO THE POLLS AND VOTE TO KEEP OUR FIRE ARMS.JOIN NRA JOIN STATE OR LOCAL FEDERATIONS SAY INVOLVED!!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT SHIPPING! |
|
Message From:
Ciampa
on
4/27/2007 9:46:57 PM
|
We should nominate Mr Thompson for a Nobel Peace Prize for selling the gun used to kill so many kids, He is the real hero in all of this. Just another ordinary American doing extraodinary things. Next we should nominate the guy who calls himseld "the Shooter" who posted this lovely gem that makes any NRA member proud - - - Message From: The Shooter on 4/25/2007 8:58:01 PM. If the students were armed this tragedy would of had either had a lot less students killed or it may not of even happened. The Guns are not the problem, our system Failed! this Kim-Chee ass Mother F****er had Psychological problems that were clear signs not to sell this S.O.B. a gun in the first place. All Citizens should be taught how to protect themselves and how to respect a Gun, a Car is a weapon, and they kill a hell of a lot more than Guns do, why aren't the F****ing Liberal Commies trying to Ban them? - - - Makes me proud to be an American!!! |
|
Message From:
kjinhunk
on
4/27/2007 9:43:35 PM
|
Message From:
Brandon
on
4/27/2007 8:07:33 PM
|
It's never the tool, it's always the person.
It's that simple.
Brandon |
|
Message From:
jeepr
on
4/27/2007 7:38:39 PM
|
I fully support your company in this unfortunate incident. The law was followed to the letter. |
|
|